Sean Park Portrait
Quote of The Day Title
Be so good they can't ignore you.
- Steve Martin, Comedian (on how to succeed)

Too few resisted.

We all know the old adage:

Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Put another way:

In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women. - T. Montana, 1983

Clearly this operates in all walks of life, including business. Including banking. But I agree with this excellent post from Overcoming Bias, that it is not inevitable. The corrupting nature of power can be resisted:

The moral of this story, and the reason for going into the evolutionary explanation, is that you shouldn’t reason as if people who are corrupted by power are evil mutants, whose mutations you do not share.

Evolution is not an infinitely powerful deceiving demon, and our ancestors evolved under conditions of not knowing about evolutionary psychology. The tendency to be corrupted by power can be beaten, I think. The “warp” doesn’t seem on the same level of deeply woven insidiousness as, say, confirmation bias.

In particular, given the many opportunities for making money and building businesses in banking, resisting should be that much easier: you can have your cake and eat it too. Perhaps just not the biggest cake in the world. And whether or not you choose to believe me (I’ll admit to the potential that I may be biased), many good people in the industry did resist. But hewing to the “Law of High School” (that life is a fractal of high school and a few immature jerks can and will ruin it for everyone), those that didn’t were over-represented at the top. And so it is not surprising that ultimately in ended in tears.

So be ambitious. Strive to succeed. But resist. You know you can.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Eddie
    "Then when you get the power, then you get the women."

    Let me raise an exception. About women -- that used to be true but its not so true anymore. Do truly intelligent men (who also have the will power to resist evil) really want to partner with dumb women even if they are gorgeous? Of course some guys will always want a trophy girl. But the power of women in the world and their contributions are changing the dynamics. This should be taken into consideration as part of the overall dynamic being discussed (e.g., context of financial services which just imploded -- how much of what implosion was in fact MAN made? Will women play a greater role in a more transparent new world order of financial services to emerge from the rubble? In fact, I sure hope so, and I welcome it. Women's maternal instinct and their hormones that drive them toward wanting progeny / future generations might be in fact just what this new world order needs for some balance and assisting in the resistance of primarily males to be bullies that spoil it for all (high school model).
  • Agree. Indeed was certainly not holding out Mr. Montana as a role model - indeed just the opposite as an apt - if gross - caricature of the powerful and corrupt.

    I definitely think that the more balanced gender make up of business and management that is emerging (and will accelerate imo with the digital generation and beyond) will on balance be a good thing. More generally, I am a big proponent of the value of heterogeneous viewpoints in any endeavor that involves dealing with uncertainty.

    The optimist in me just thinks the events of 2008 will only act to accelerate (to the good) what is an already latent secular trend to more women affecting the decisions and outcomes in our businesses and our economy.
blog comments powered by Disqus