Sean Park Portrait
Quote of The Day Title
There's no bad time to innovate.
- Jeff Bezos

Markets in everything: p2p education

It will come as no shock to most readers that I think one of the key opportunities of the next decade or so is to harness the possibilities unlocked by the advances in ICT – most notably the continuing march towards a ubiquitous, high-speed internet – to vastly lower transaction costs and enable robust, distributed marketplaces to emerge in sectors and activities where heretofore the (informational and transactional) costs of organizing such a market would have been prohibitive. While it is certainly an oversimplification, I think such opportunities can be broadly categorized into two groups:

  • those that make the transactional mechanisms of existing markets more efficient – either incrementally or by a quantum shift to a new market structure – by reducing informational friction and arbitrage and eliminating parasitic intermediaries while at the same time massively improving the productivity of ‘intelligent’ intermediaries; and
  • those that enable markets to emerge where previously none existed at all (or only in the broadest economic sense, but where transactions were previously ad hoc and opaque), often (but not always) these are markets for services (rather than goods or financial instruments) where the nature of the service is highly heterogeneous and in data terms is “unstructured” rather than “structured”*

Putting my money where my mouth is, I’ve taken the opportunity to invest in two exciting start-ups that fall into this second group: last year in seedcamp ‘07 winner MyBuilder.com and just now in (seedcamp ‘07 finalist) School of Everything. Both have passionate, energetic and visionary founders that have been able to translate their ideas into robust and well-executed platforms for organizing and ‘trading’ specialist services. As for any pioneering start-up, neither can be sure of success, however the combination of a fundamentally sound idea, in harmony with the inevitable secular change in how economic activity will be organized in a networked world, married to a strong committed team is as good a place as any to start. School of Everything logo

I must admit in the case of SoE, part of my motivation to invest was driven by a more emotional and/or intellectual interest in what they have set out to do:

Our current education system was designed in the industrial revolution to prepare people for factory work. The world has changed a lot since then – and the time has come to rethink education from the bottom to the top.

At School of Everything, we believe that learning is personal, and starts not with what you ’should’ learn but with what you’re interested in. So we’re building a tool to help anyone in the world learn everything, and teach anything, how and when suits them – by putting people in touch with each other, not with institutions.

Not only is education and learning the lifeblood of our modern economy and an important social good, but by creating a marketplace for people to ‘distribute’ and acquire skills and knowledge, SoE is providing another very useful output for harnessing what Clay Shirky has identified as society’s “cognitive surplus.”

Now, the interesting thing about a surplus like that is that society doesn’t know what to do with it at first–hence the gin, hence the sitcoms. Because if people knew what to do with a surplus with reference to the existing social institutions, then it wouldn’t be a surplus, would it? It’s precisely when no one has any idea how to deploy something that people have to start experimenting with it, in order for the surplus to get integrated, and the course of that integration can transform society.

The early phase for taking advantage of this cognitive surplus, the phase I think we’re still in, is all special cases. The physics of participation is much more like the physics of weather than it is like the physics of gravity. We know all the forces that combine to make these kinds of things work: there’s an interesting community over here, there’s an interesting sharing model over there, those people are collaborating on open source software. But despite knowing the inputs, we can’t predict the outputs yet because there’s so much complexity.

The way you explore complex ecosystems is you just try lots and lots and lots of things, and you hope that everybody who fails fails informatively so that you can at least find a skull on a pikestaff near where you’re going. That’s the phase we’re in now.

So if there is something you’ve always wanted to learn, or something you’d love to teach to others, School of Everything is a pretty good place to start. I wonder if anyone is giving courses on how to run a bank…you’d think demand for that might be pretty high these days… ;) Given these tough economic times I suspect that SoE is even more useful, whether it’s to learn a new skill to keep an existing job (or find a new one) or to earn a bit of money and/or social capital by teaching if you’ve suffered the misfortune of losing your job or are working reduced hours.

In any event, I’m very excited to become a small part of this and congratulate Paul and his team on this follow-on funding and wish them great success in building SoE into a wonderful global marketplace for learning.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Great to see that you share my vision on School of Everything. I thought they were one of the best of the Seedcamp 07 batch and was disappointed they weren't getting more love from the investor community...
  • Yet another new Market - this time its for Product Placement: www.placevine.com
  • Darren
    Mr. Park,

    Your blog is refreshing and seems realistic yet hopeful and optimistic. I also have read some of Paul Graham's essays in which he seems to think we have entered a new epoch (the digital age which could be as big of a shift as was the one from agrarian to industrial revolution). So ... when I listen to some of these economists like Robert Shiller and also Mohamed El-Erian who is the CEO of PIMCO, they all speak in brick and mortar legacy terms (Shiller speaks about real estate mostly and understandably since he has an index named after him). Shiller is in his 60s? El-Erian is in his early 50s? El-Erian gave a speech a few weeks ago at the Los Angeles library and he offered nothing in terms of hope for the future (in the wake of the financial collapse) and he even spoke of his 5 year old daughter. But a guy like El-Erian, as smart as he might be, would be totally disoriented if he was asked to write a Hello World program in PHP! LOL! Seriously, of course we need infrastructure including houses and cars, food and shelter (and energy / oil is a big deal and we need to wean off of it). But a guy like El-Erian, he seems so unimaginative as to what might come from the rubble (to his credit, in his presentation, he did say that structured finance was an innovation that much of the financial world fell in love with but didn't perhaps fully understand or didn't ask the question of how sustainable it would be, and he said that in the first wave of innovation it is not uncommon for humanity to fall in love with the technology only to see it crash and cause tears and most people lose money in the process ... but El-Erian said nothing about the second wave of innovation and the opportunities for the future). It really irks me when these 50-something guys who did not grow up "Being Digital" say nothing about bright spots in the future. Given your history in finance and your also understanding of the digerati, can you comment on El-Erian, et al? Oh yes, and another question that is related -- a lot of these economists keep saying we could have an "L shaped" Japan like sideways recovery to the economy that could span a decade or more. What is weird is that I don't hear people in Japan commenting on this and I'm wondering if its almost a bit racist? I have some really nice Japanese friends and I feel badly for them when I hear these know-it-all PhD's (who have been turned into cult figures by the media lately) refer to Japan being really bad. I guess there is some truth to it and its not a rosy picture, but I want to better understand this. Thank you for any insights you can share (its ok, you don't have to paint a rosy picture but I'm trying to figure out the big picture and why is it that all these 50-something CEOs and PhDs are so doomy and gloomy -- I respect wisdom, maturity, responsibility, intelligence, life experiences and insight so its not as if I don't have any respect for my elders).
  • Darren thanks for your comment. If you have the time, if you've had the chance to read me for long, you'll know that one of my major frustrations - indeed it was a significant factor in deciding to leave investment banking after 16 years (that and the fact that the industry had lost the plot...) - was the fact that the men (and it was pretty much all men) in charge were exactly these 50 and 60 somethings - late stage baby boomers, who were uber-adapted to the late 20th century economic and corporate paradigm but were (at that point) in denial about the increasing and inevitable obsolescence of that framework and the business models and leaders that thrived within it.

    One reason I think they are now all 'doom and gloom' as you put it, is that while they now understand that the old paradigm is gone, they have no concept as to what it might be replaced with. I'm starting to get up there and I didn't grow up with computers, didn't have a mobile phone until my mid/late 20s and first surfed the net around that time too. But I was young enough to see it coming. The divide with people even as little as 5 and definitely 10 years older than me is stark. They were brought up - not just as children, but as adults, as business people - in a world defined by high transaction costs and information scarcity. The complete opposite of the world we find ourselves in in 2009. No wonder they are gloomy. The problem is they still command the 'heights' of the economy. Of course this is a broad generalization and over-simplification, and make no mistake it is not that these folks aren't smart, but as Perez points out, historically it has always taken a generational change (with a lag) for society to adapt to technological change.

    What's worse, these people live in a echo chamber: they don't hear dissent, they only talk to each other and any potential dissenters in their circle (usually younger and thus more junior) are too intimidated to dissent. You get a meeting with Mohamed El-Erian, what's the likelihood - honestly - that you are going to tell him that he doesn't get it when manifestly the power and money that surrounds him is telling him that he manifestly does! I don't know him personally so I don't mean to single him out, and clearly some people that rise to these commanding heights are naturally arrogant and brook no dissent, but you would be surprised how easy it is to slip into a cocoon when you reach these kind of positions even if you fight hard to 'stay real.' To take the extreme example, look how Obama lost his blackberry when he became President. It's the paradox of power and control, you are nominally in charge but the system controls and filters all your inputs.
  • Congrats on the SoE round.

    An SoE API throttled through www.Mashery.com and plugged into the Open Source www.Moodle.org 's ecosystem should help SoE grow fast. Moodle has 29+ million users!

    SoE as a Moodle partner could provide bi-directional synergy for both to grow value. SoE get's access to loads of teachers/students and Moodle teachers get access to the SoE market/platform (distribution channel).

    Google have realized the value of Moodle and implemented an integration of Google apps into Moodle CRM in colloboration with a Moodle partner, Moodlerooms. See: http://moodlerooms.com/ & http://bit.ly/rgaUb & http://bit.ly/ACfvt

    For more structured teaching/learning, SoE could also provide a Moodle powered bespoke Course Management System (SoE Services) on a free, freemium or premium subscription basis. I am sure you have though all this through and my comments are likely redundant.

    The Moodle ecosystem has:
    Registered validated sites: 50,899
    Number of countries: 208
    Courses: 2,685,791
    Users: 29,306,810
    Teachers: 1,868,246
    Enrolments: 21,523,739
    Forum posts: 36,858,465
    Resources: 21,377,965
    Quiz questions: 28,720,142
    See: http://moodle.org/stats/

    As a matter of fact, SoE could probably base its entire platform on a bespoke Moodle CRM if you wanted to and with www.Alfresco.com integration thrown in for document management - way better than Sharepoint - Alfresco is FOSS (Free Open Source Software) to boot!

    BTW, if you need an Open Source systems integrator to stitch it all together, try www.optaros.com

    Getting a distribution deal with http://sharethis.com/ for the SoE "Learn This" & "Teach This" buttons may help tap into a strong, relevant, viral loop. As you know, ShareThis is fast becoming ubiquitous.

    In the UK a cross marketing agreement with P2P mentoring exchange www.horsesmouth.co.uk may help grow SoE.

    SoE is a brilliant venture. Good luck!
  • Thanks for the ideas, I'll pass them on to the team.
blog comments powered by Disqus